Example of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) metric to evaluate classifier output quality.

ROC curves typically feature true positive rate on the Y axis, and false positive rate on the X axis. This means that the top left corner of the plot is the “ideal” point - a false positive rate of zero, and a true positive rate of one. This is not very realistic, but it does mean that a larger area under the curve (AUC) is usually better.

The “steepness” of ROC curves is also important, since it is ideal to maximize the true positive rate while minimizing the false positive rate.

ROC curves are typically used in binary classification to study the output of a classifier. In order to extend ROC curve and ROC area to multi-label classification, it is necessary to binarize the output. One ROC curve can be drawn per label, but one can also draw a ROC curve by considering each element of the label indicator matrix as a binary prediction (micro-averaging).

Another evaluation measure for multi-label classification is macro-averaging, which gives equal weight to the classification of each label.

print(__doc__)

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from itertools import cycle

from sklearn import svm, datasets
from sklearn.metrics import roc_curve, auc
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import label_binarize
from sklearn.multiclass import OneVsRestClassifier
from scipy import interp
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score

# Import some data to play with
X = iris.data
y = iris.target

# Binarize the output
y = label_binarize(y, classes=[0, 1, 2])
n_classes = y.shape[1]

# Add noisy features to make the problem harder
random_state = np.random.RandomState(0)
n_samples, n_features = X.shape
X = np.c_[X, random_state.randn(n_samples, 200 * n_features)]

# shuffle and split training and test sets
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=.5,
random_state=0)

# Learn to predict each class against the other
classifier = OneVsRestClassifier(svm.SVC(kernel='linear', probability=True,
random_state=random_state))
y_score = classifier.fit(X_train, y_train).decision_function(X_test)

# Compute ROC curve and ROC area for each class
fpr = dict()
tpr = dict()
roc_auc = dict()
for i in range(n_classes):
fpr[i], tpr[i], _ = roc_curve(y_test[:, i], y_score[:, i])
roc_auc[i] = auc(fpr[i], tpr[i])

# Compute micro-average ROC curve and ROC area
fpr["micro"], tpr["micro"], _ = roc_curve(y_test.ravel(), y_score.ravel())
roc_auc["micro"] = auc(fpr["micro"], tpr["micro"])


Plot of a ROC curve for a specific class

plt.figure()
lw = 2
plt.plot(fpr[2], tpr[2], color='darkorange',
lw=lw, label='ROC curve (area = %0.2f)' % roc_auc[2])
plt.plot([0, 1], [0, 1], color='navy', lw=lw, linestyle='--')
plt.xlim([0.0, 1.0])
plt.ylim([0.0, 1.05])
plt.xlabel('False Positive Rate')
plt.ylabel('True Positive Rate')
plt.legend(loc="lower right")
plt.show()


## Plot ROC curves for the multilabel problem¶

Compute macro-average ROC curve and ROC area

# First aggregate all false positive rates
all_fpr = np.unique(np.concatenate([fpr[i] for i in range(n_classes)]))

# Then interpolate all ROC curves at this points
mean_tpr = np.zeros_like(all_fpr)
for i in range(n_classes):
mean_tpr += interp(all_fpr, fpr[i], tpr[i])

# Finally average it and compute AUC
mean_tpr /= n_classes

fpr["macro"] = all_fpr
tpr["macro"] = mean_tpr
roc_auc["macro"] = auc(fpr["macro"], tpr["macro"])

# Plot all ROC curves
plt.figure()
plt.plot(fpr["micro"], tpr["micro"],
label='micro-average ROC curve (area = {0:0.2f})'
''.format(roc_auc["micro"]),
color='deeppink', linestyle=':', linewidth=4)

plt.plot(fpr["macro"], tpr["macro"],
label='macro-average ROC curve (area = {0:0.2f})'
''.format(roc_auc["macro"]),
color='navy', linestyle=':', linewidth=4)

colors = cycle(['aqua', 'darkorange', 'cornflowerblue'])
for i, color in zip(range(n_classes), colors):
plt.plot(fpr[i], tpr[i], color=color, lw=lw,
label='ROC curve of class {0} (area = {1:0.2f})'
''.format(i, roc_auc[i]))

plt.plot([0, 1], [0, 1], 'k--', lw=lw)
plt.xlim([0.0, 1.0])
plt.ylim([0.0, 1.05])
plt.xlabel('False Positive Rate')
plt.ylabel('True Positive Rate')
plt.title('Some extension of Receiver operating characteristic to multi-class')
plt.legend(loc="lower right")
plt.show()


Out:

/home/circleci/project/examples/model_selection/plot_roc.py:112: DeprecationWarning: scipy.interp is deprecated and will be removed in SciPy 2.0.0, use numpy.interp instead
mean_tpr += interp(all_fpr, fpr[i], tpr[i])


## Area under ROC for the multiclass problem¶

The sklearn.metrics.roc_auc_score function can be used for multi-class classification. The multi-class One-vs-One scheme compares every unique pairwise combination of classes. In this section, we calculate the AUC using the OvR and OvO schemes. We report a macro average, and a prevalence-weighted average.

y_prob = classifier.predict_proba(X_test)

macro_roc_auc_ovo = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob, multi_class="ovo",
average="macro")
weighted_roc_auc_ovo = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob, multi_class="ovo",
average="weighted")
macro_roc_auc_ovr = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob, multi_class="ovr",
average="macro")
weighted_roc_auc_ovr = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob, multi_class="ovr",
average="weighted")
print("One-vs-One ROC AUC scores:\n{:.6f} (macro),\n{:.6f} "
"(weighted by prevalence)"
.format(macro_roc_auc_ovo, weighted_roc_auc_ovo))
print("One-vs-Rest ROC AUC scores:\n{:.6f} (macro),\n{:.6f} "
"(weighted by prevalence)"
.format(macro_roc_auc_ovr, weighted_roc_auc_ovr))


Out:

One-vs-One ROC AUC scores:
0.698586 (macro),
0.665839 (weighted by prevalence)
One-vs-Rest ROC AUC scores:
0.698586 (macro),
0.665839 (weighted by prevalence)


Total running time of the script: ( 0 minutes 0.261 seconds)

Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery