sklearn.metrics
.adjusted_rand_score¶

sklearn.metrics.
adjusted_rand_score
(labels_true, labels_pred)[source]¶ Rand index adjusted for chance.
The Rand Index computes a similarity measure between two clusterings by considering all pairs of samples and counting pairs that are assigned in the same or different clusters in the predicted and true clusterings.
The raw RI score is then “adjusted for chance” into the ARI score using the following scheme:
ARI = (RI  Expected_RI) / (max(RI)  Expected_RI)
The adjusted Rand index is thus ensured to have a value close to 0.0 for random labeling independently of the number of clusters and samples and exactly 1.0 when the clusterings are identical (up to a permutation).
ARI is a symmetric measure:
adjusted_rand_score(a, b) == adjusted_rand_score(b, a)
Read more in the User Guide.
Parameters: labels_true : int array, shape = [n_samples]
Ground truth class labels to be used as a reference
labels_pred : array, shape = [n_samples]
Cluster labels to evaluate
Returns: ari : float
Similarity score between 1.0 and 1.0. Random labelings have an ARI close to 0.0. 1.0 stands for perfect match.
See also
adjusted_mutual_info_score
 Adjusted Mutual Information
References
[Hubert1985474476] L. Hubert and P. Arabie, Comparing Partitions, Journal of Classification 1985 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01908075 [wk474476] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_index#Adjusted_Rand_index Examples
Perfectly matching labelings have a score of 1 even
>>> from sklearn.metrics.cluster import adjusted_rand_score >>> adjusted_rand_score([0, 0, 1, 1], [0, 0, 1, 1]) 1.0 >>> adjusted_rand_score([0, 0, 1, 1], [1, 1, 0, 0]) 1.0
Labelings that assign all classes members to the same clusters are complete be not always pure, hence penalized:
>>> adjusted_rand_score([0, 0, 1, 2], [0, 0, 1, 1]) 0.57...
ARI is symmetric, so labelings that have pure clusters with members coming from the same classes but unnecessary splits are penalized:
>>> adjusted_rand_score([0, 0, 1, 1], [0, 0, 1, 2]) 0.57...
If classes members are completely split across different clusters, the assignment is totally incomplete, hence the ARI is very low:
>>> adjusted_rand_score([0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 2, 3]) 0.0