# 1.5. Stochastic Gradient Descent¶

**Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)** is a simple yet very efficient
approach to fitting linear classifiers and regressors under
convex loss functions such as (linear) Support Vector Machines and Logistic
Regression.
Even though SGD has been around in the machine learning community for
a long time, it has received a considerable amount of attention just
recently in the context of large-scale learning.

SGD has been successfully applied to large-scale and sparse machine learning problems often encountered in text classification and natural language processing. Given that the data is sparse, the classifiers in this module easily scale to problems with more than 10^5 training examples and more than 10^5 features.

Strictly speaking, SGD is merely an optimization technique and does not
correspond to a specific family of machine learning models. It is only a
*way* to train a model. Often, an instance of `SGDClassifier`

or
`SGDRegressor`

will have an equivalent estimator in
the scikit-learn API, potentially using a different optimization technique.
For example, using `SGDClassifier(loss='log_loss')`

results in logistic regression,
i.e. a model equivalent to `LogisticRegression`

which is fitted via SGD instead of being fitted by one of the other solvers
in `LogisticRegression`

. Similarly,
`SGDRegressor(loss='squared_error', penalty='l2')`

and
`Ridge`

solve the same optimization problem, via
different means.

The advantages of Stochastic Gradient Descent are:

Efficiency.

Ease of implementation (lots of opportunities for code tuning).

The disadvantages of Stochastic Gradient Descent include:

SGD requires a number of hyperparameters such as the regularization parameter and the number of iterations.

SGD is sensitive to feature scaling.

Warning

Make sure you permute (shuffle) your training data before fitting the model
or use `shuffle=True`

to shuffle after each iteration (used by default).
Also, ideally, features should be standardized using e.g.
`make_pipeline(StandardScaler(), SGDClassifier())`

(see Pipelines).

## 1.5.1. Classification¶

The class `SGDClassifier`

implements a plain stochastic gradient
descent learning routine which supports different loss functions and
penalties for classification. Below is the decision boundary of a
`SGDClassifier`

trained with the hinge loss, equivalent to a linear SVM.

As other classifiers, SGD has to be fitted with two arrays: an array `X`

of shape (n_samples, n_features) holding the training samples, and an
array y of shape (n_samples,) holding the target values (class labels)
for the training samples:

```
>>> from sklearn.linear_model import SGDClassifier
>>> X = [[0., 0.], [1., 1.]]
>>> y = [0, 1]
>>> clf = SGDClassifier(loss="hinge", penalty="l2", max_iter=5)
>>> clf.fit(X, y)
SGDClassifier(max_iter=5)
```

After being fitted, the model can then be used to predict new values:

```
>>> clf.predict([[2., 2.]])
array([1])
```

SGD fits a linear model to the training data. The `coef_`

attribute holds
the model parameters:

```
>>> clf.coef_
array([[9.9..., 9.9...]])
```

The `intercept_`

attribute holds the intercept (aka offset or bias):

```
>>> clf.intercept_
array([-9.9...])
```

Whether or not the model should use an intercept, i.e. a biased
hyperplane, is controlled by the parameter `fit_intercept`

.

The signed distance to the hyperplane (computed as the dot product between
the coefficients and the input sample, plus the intercept) is given by
`SGDClassifier.decision_function`

:

```
>>> clf.decision_function([[2., 2.]])
array([29.6...])
```

The concrete loss function can be set via the `loss`

parameter. `SGDClassifier`

supports the following loss functions:

`loss="hinge"`

: (soft-margin) linear Support Vector Machine,

`loss="modified_huber"`

: smoothed hinge loss,

`loss="log_loss"`

: logistic regression,and all regression losses below. In this case the target is encoded as -1 or 1, and the problem is treated as a regression problem. The predicted class then correspond to the sign of the predicted target.

Please refer to the mathematical section below for formulas. The first two loss functions are lazy, they only update the model parameters if an example violates the margin constraint, which makes training very efficient and may result in sparser models (i.e. with more zero coefficients), even when L2 penalty is used.

Using `loss="log_loss"`

or `loss="modified_huber"`

enables the
`predict_proba`

method, which gives a vector of probability estimates
\(P(y|x)\) per sample \(x\):

```
>>> clf = SGDClassifier(loss="log_loss", max_iter=5).fit(X, y)
>>> clf.predict_proba([[1., 1.]])
array([[0.00..., 0.99...]])
```

The concrete penalty can be set via the `penalty`

parameter.
SGD supports the following penalties:

`penalty="l2"`

: L2 norm penalty on`coef_`

.

`penalty="l1"`

: L1 norm penalty on`coef_`

.

`penalty="elasticnet"`

: Convex combination of L2 and L1;`(1 - l1_ratio) * L2 + l1_ratio * L1`

.

The default setting is `penalty="l2"`

. The L1 penalty leads to sparse
solutions, driving most coefficients to zero. The Elastic Net 11 solves
some deficiencies of the L1 penalty in the presence of highly correlated
attributes. The parameter `l1_ratio`

controls the convex combination
of L1 and L2 penalty.

`SGDClassifier`

supports multi-class classification by combining
multiple binary classifiers in a “one versus all” (OVA) scheme. For each
of the \(K\) classes, a binary classifier is learned that discriminates
between that and all other \(K-1\) classes. At testing time, we compute the
confidence score (i.e. the signed distances to the hyperplane) for each
classifier and choose the class with the highest confidence. The Figure
below illustrates the OVA approach on the iris dataset. The dashed
lines represent the three OVA classifiers; the background colors show
the decision surface induced by the three classifiers.

In the case of multi-class classification `coef_`

is a two-dimensional
array of shape (n_classes, n_features) and `intercept_`

is a
one-dimensional array of shape (n_classes,). The i-th row of `coef_`

holds
the weight vector of the OVA classifier for the i-th class; classes are
indexed in ascending order (see attribute `classes_`

).
Note that, in principle, since they allow to create a probability model,
`loss="log_loss"`

and `loss="modified_huber"`

are more suitable for
one-vs-all classification.

`SGDClassifier`

supports both weighted classes and weighted
instances via the fit parameters `class_weight`

and `sample_weight`

. See
the examples below and the docstring of `SGDClassifier.fit`

for
further information.

`SGDClassifier`

supports averaged SGD (ASGD) 10. Averaging can be
enabled by setting `average=True`

. ASGD performs the same updates as the
regular SGD (see Mathematical formulation), but instead of using
the last value of the coefficients as the `coef_`

attribute (i.e. the values
of the last update), `coef_`

is set instead to the **average** value of the
coefficients across all updates. The same is done for the `intercept_`

attribute. When using ASGD the learning rate can be larger and even constant,
leading on some datasets to a speed up in training time.

For classification with a logistic loss, another variant of SGD with an
averaging strategy is available with Stochastic Average Gradient (SAG)
algorithm, available as a solver in `LogisticRegression`

.

## 1.5.2. Regression¶

The class `SGDRegressor`

implements a plain stochastic gradient
descent learning routine which supports different loss functions and
penalties to fit linear regression models. `SGDRegressor`

is
well suited for regression problems with a large number of training
samples (> 10.000), for other problems we recommend `Ridge`

,
`Lasso`

, or `ElasticNet`

.

The concrete loss function can be set via the `loss`

parameter. `SGDRegressor`

supports the following loss functions:

`loss="squared_error"`

: Ordinary least squares,

`loss="huber"`

: Huber loss for robust regression,

`loss="epsilon_insensitive"`

: linear Support Vector Regression.

Please refer to the mathematical section below for formulas.
The Huber and epsilon-insensitive loss functions can be used for
robust regression. The width of the insensitive region has to be
specified via the parameter `epsilon`

. This parameter depends on the
scale of the target variables.

The `penalty`

parameter determines the regularization to be used (see
description above in the classification section).

`SGDRegressor`

also supports averaged SGD 10 (here again, see
description above in the classification section).

For regression with a squared loss and a l2 penalty, another variant of
SGD with an averaging strategy is available with Stochastic Average
Gradient (SAG) algorithm, available as a solver in `Ridge`

.

## 1.5.3. Online One-Class SVM¶

The class `sklearn.linear_model.SGDOneClassSVM`

implements an online
linear version of the One-Class SVM using a stochastic gradient descent.
Combined with kernel approximation techniques,
`sklearn.linear_model.SGDOneClassSVM`

can be used to approximate the
solution of a kernelized One-Class SVM, implemented in
`sklearn.svm.OneClassSVM`

, with a linear complexity in the number of
samples. Note that the complexity of a kernelized One-Class SVM is at best
quadratic in the number of samples.
`sklearn.linear_model.SGDOneClassSVM`

is thus well suited for datasets
with a large number of training samples (> 10,000) for which the SGD
variant can be several orders of magnitude faster.

Its implementation is based on the implementation of the stochastic gradient descent. Indeed, the original optimization problem of the One-Class SVM is given by

where \(\nu \in (0, 1]\) is the user-specified parameter controlling the proportion of outliers and the proportion of support vectors. Getting rid of the slack variables \(\xi_i\) this problem is equivalent to

Multiplying by the constant \(\nu\) and introducing the intercept \(b = 1 - \rho\) we obtain the following equivalent optimization problem

This is similar to the optimization problems studied in section Mathematical formulation with \(y_i = 1, 1 \leq i \leq n\) and \(\alpha = \nu/2\), \(L\) being the hinge loss function and \(R\) being the L2 norm. We just need to add the term \(b\nu\) in the optimization loop.

As `SGDClassifier`

and `SGDRegressor`

, `SGDOneClassSVM`

supports averaged SGD. Averaging can be enabled by setting `average=True`

.

## 1.5.4. Stochastic Gradient Descent for sparse data¶

Note

The sparse implementation produces slightly different results from the dense implementation, due to a shrunk learning rate for the intercept. See Implementation details.

There is built-in support for sparse data given in any matrix in a format supported by scipy.sparse. For maximum efficiency, however, use the CSR matrix format as defined in scipy.sparse.csr_matrix.

## 1.5.5. Complexity¶

The major advantage of SGD is its efficiency, which is basically linear in the number of training examples. If X is a matrix of size (n, p) training has a cost of \(O(k n \bar p)\), where k is the number of iterations (epochs) and \(\bar p\) is the average number of non-zero attributes per sample.

Recent theoretical results, however, show that the runtime to get some desired optimization accuracy does not increase as the training set size increases.

## 1.5.6. Stopping criterion¶

The classes `SGDClassifier`

and `SGDRegressor`

provide two
criteria to stop the algorithm when a given level of convergence is reached:

With

`early_stopping=True`

, the input data is split into a training set and a validation set. The model is then fitted on the training set, and the stopping criterion is based on the prediction score (using the`score`

method) computed on the validation set. The size of the validation set can be changed with the parameter`validation_fraction`

.With

`early_stopping=False`

, the model is fitted on the entire input data and the stopping criterion is based on the objective function computed on the training data.

In both cases, the criterion is evaluated once by epoch, and the algorithm stops
when the criterion does not improve `n_iter_no_change`

times in a row. The
improvement is evaluated with absolute tolerance `tol`

, and the algorithm
stops in any case after a maximum number of iteration `max_iter`

.

## 1.5.7. Tips on Practical Use¶

Stochastic Gradient Descent is sensitive to feature scaling, so it is highly recommended to scale your data. For example, scale each attribute on the input vector X to [0,1] or [-1,+1], or standardize it to have mean 0 and variance 1. Note that the

samescaling must be applied to the test vector to obtain meaningful results. This can be easily done using`StandardScaler`

:from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler scaler = StandardScaler() scaler.fit(X_train) # Don't cheat - fit only on training data X_train = scaler.transform(X_train) X_test = scaler.transform(X_test) # apply same transformation to test data # Or better yet: use a pipeline! from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline est = make_pipeline(StandardScaler(), SGDClassifier()) est.fit(X_train) est.predict(X_test)If your attributes have an intrinsic scale (e.g. word frequencies or indicator features) scaling is not needed.

Finding a reasonable regularization term \(\alpha\) is best done using automatic hyper-parameter search, e.g.

`GridSearchCV`

or`RandomizedSearchCV`

, usually in the range`10.0**-np.arange(1,7)`

.Empirically, we found that SGD converges after observing approximately 10^6 training samples. Thus, a reasonable first guess for the number of iterations is

`max_iter = np.ceil(10**6 / n)`

, where`n`

is the size of the training set.If you apply SGD to features extracted using PCA we found that it is often wise to scale the feature values by some constant

`c`

such that the average L2 norm of the training data equals one.We found that Averaged SGD works best with a larger number of features and a higher eta0

References:

“Efficient BackProp” Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, G. Orr, K. Müller - In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade 1998.

## 1.5.8. Mathematical formulation¶

We describe here the mathematical details of the SGD procedure. A good overview with convergence rates can be found in 12.

Given a set of training examples \((x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_n, y_n)\) where \(x_i \in \mathbf{R}^m\) and \(y_i \in \mathcal{R}\) (\(y_i \in {-1, 1}\) for classification), our goal is to learn a linear scoring function \(f(x) = w^T x + b\) with model parameters \(w \in \mathbf{R}^m\) and intercept \(b \in \mathbf{R}\). In order to make predictions for binary classification, we simply look at the sign of \(f(x)\). To find the model parameters, we minimize the regularized training error given by

where \(L\) is a loss function that measures model (mis)fit and \(R\) is a regularization term (aka penalty) that penalizes model complexity; \(\alpha > 0\) is a non-negative hyperparameter that controls the regularization strength.

Different choices for \(L\) entail different classifiers or regressors:

Hinge (soft-margin): equivalent to Support Vector Classification. \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = \max(0, 1 - y_i f(x_i))\).

Perceptron: \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = \max(0, - y_i f(x_i))\).

Modified Huber: \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = \max(0, 1 - y_i f(x_i))^2\) if \(y_i f(x_i) > 1\), and \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = -4 y_i f(x_i)\) otherwise.

Log Loss: equivalent to Logistic Regression. \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = \log(1 + \exp (-y_i f(x_i)))\).

Squared Error: Linear regression (Ridge or Lasso depending on \(R\)). \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = \frac{1}{2}(y_i - f(x_i))^2\).

Huber: less sensitive to outliers than least-squares. It is equivalent to least squares when \(|y_i - f(x_i)| \leq \varepsilon\), and \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = \varepsilon |y_i - f(x_i)| - \frac{1}{2} \varepsilon^2\) otherwise.

Epsilon-Insensitive: (soft-margin) equivalent to Support Vector Regression. \(L(y_i, f(x_i)) = \max(0, |y_i - f(x_i)| - \varepsilon)\).

All of the above loss functions can be regarded as an upper bound on the misclassification error (Zero-one loss) as shown in the Figure below.

Popular choices for the regularization term \(R\) (the `penalty`

parameter) include:

L2 norm: \(R(w) := \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j=1}^{m} w_j^2 = ||w||_2^2\),

L1 norm: \(R(w) := \sum_{j=1}^{m} |w_j|\), which leads to sparse solutions.

Elastic Net: \(R(w) := \frac{\rho}{2} \sum_{j=1}^{n} w_j^2 + (1-\rho) \sum_{j=1}^{m} |w_j|\), a convex combination of L2 and L1, where \(\rho\) is given by

`1 - l1_ratio`

.

The Figure below shows the contours of the different regularization terms in a 2-dimensional parameter space (\(m=2\)) when \(R(w) = 1\).

### 1.5.8.1. SGD¶

Stochastic gradient descent is an optimization method for unconstrained optimization problems. In contrast to (batch) gradient descent, SGD approximates the true gradient of \(E(w,b)\) by considering a single training example at a time.

The class `SGDClassifier`

implements a first-order SGD learning
routine. The algorithm iterates over the training examples and for each
example updates the model parameters according to the update rule given by

where \(\eta\) is the learning rate which controls the step-size in the parameter space. The intercept \(b\) is updated similarly but without regularization (and with additional decay for sparse matrices, as detailed in Implementation details).

The learning rate \(\eta\) can be either constant or gradually decaying. For
classification, the default learning rate schedule (`learning_rate='optimal'`

)
is given by

where \(t\) is the time step (there are a total of `n_samples * n_iter`

time steps), \(t_0\) is determined based on a heuristic proposed by Léon Bottou
such that the expected initial updates are comparable with the expected
size of the weights (this assuming that the norm of the training samples is
approx. 1). The exact definition can be found in `_init_t`

in `BaseSGD`

.

For regression the default learning rate schedule is inverse scaling
(`learning_rate='invscaling'`

), given by

where \(eta_0\) and \(power\_t\) are hyperparameters chosen by the
user via `eta0`

and `power_t`

, resp.

For a constant learning rate use `learning_rate='constant'`

and use `eta0`

to specify the learning rate.

For an adaptively decreasing learning rate, use `learning_rate='adaptive'`

and use `eta0`

to specify the starting learning rate. When the stopping
criterion is reached, the learning rate is divided by 5, and the algorithm
does not stop. The algorithm stops when the learning rate goes below 1e-6.

The model parameters can be accessed through the `coef_`

and
`intercept_`

attributes: `coef_`

holds the weights \(w\) and
`intercept_`

holds \(b\).

When using Averaged SGD (with the `average`

parameter), `coef_`

is set to the
average weight across all updates:
`coef_`

\(= \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t=0}^{T-1} w^{(t)}\),
where \(T\) is the total number of updates, found in the `t_`

attribute.

## 1.5.9. Implementation details¶

The implementation of SGD is influenced by the `Stochastic Gradient SVM`

of
7.
Similar to SvmSGD,
the weight vector is represented as the product of a scalar and a vector
which allows an efficient weight update in the case of L2 regularization.
In the case of sparse input `X`

, the intercept is updated with a
smaller learning rate (multiplied by 0.01) to account for the fact that
it is updated more frequently. Training examples are picked up sequentially
and the learning rate is lowered after each observed example. We adopted the
learning rate schedule from 8.
For multi-class classification, a “one versus all” approach is used.
We use the truncated gradient algorithm proposed in 9
for L1 regularization (and the Elastic Net).
The code is written in Cython.

References:

- 7
“Stochastic Gradient Descent” L. Bottou - Website, 2010.

- 8
“Pegasos: Primal estimated sub-gradient solver for svm” S. Shalev-Shwartz, Y. Singer, N. Srebro - In Proceedings of ICML ‘07.

- 9
“Stochastic gradient descent training for l1-regularized log-linear models with cumulative penalty” Y. Tsuruoka, J. Tsujii, S. Ananiadou - In Proceedings of the AFNLP/ACL ‘09.

- 10(1,2)
“Towards Optimal One Pass Large Scale Learning with Averaged Stochastic Gradient Descent” Xu, Wei (2011)

- 11
“Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net” H. Zou, T. Hastie - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 67 (2), 301-320.

- 12
“Solving large scale linear prediction problems using stochastic gradient descent algorithms” T. Zhang - In Proceedings of ICML ‘04.