1.13. Feature selection#
The classes in the sklearn.feature_selection
module can be used
for feature selection/dimensionality reduction on sample sets, either to
improve estimators’ accuracy scores or to boost their performance on very
high-dimensional datasets.
1.13.1. Removing features with low variance#
VarianceThreshold
is a simple baseline approach to feature selection.
It removes all features whose variance doesn’t meet some threshold.
By default, it removes all zero-variance features,
i.e. features that have the same value in all samples.
As an example, suppose that we have a dataset with boolean features, and we want to remove all features that are either one or zero (on or off) in more than 80% of the samples. Boolean features are Bernoulli random variables, and the variance of such variables is given by
so we can select using the threshold .8 * (1 - .8)
:
>>> from sklearn.feature_selection import VarianceThreshold
>>> X = [[0, 0, 1], [0, 1, 0], [1, 0, 0], [0, 1, 1], [0, 1, 0], [0, 1, 1]]
>>> sel = VarianceThreshold(threshold=(.8 * (1 - .8)))
>>> sel.fit_transform(X)
array([[0, 1],
[1, 0],
[0, 0],
[1, 1],
[1, 0],
[1, 1]])
As expected, VarianceThreshold
has removed the first column,
which has a probability \(p = 5/6 > .8\) of containing a zero.
1.13.2. Univariate feature selection#
Univariate feature selection works by selecting the best features based on
univariate statistical tests. It can be seen as a preprocessing step
to an estimator. Scikit-learn exposes feature selection routines
as objects that implement the transform
method:
SelectKBest
removes all but the \(k\) highest scoring featuresSelectPercentile
removes all but a user-specified highest scoring percentage of featuresusing common univariate statistical tests for each feature: false positive rate
SelectFpr
, false discovery rateSelectFdr
, or family wise errorSelectFwe
.GenericUnivariateSelect
allows to perform univariate feature selection with a configurable strategy. This allows to select the best univariate selection strategy with hyper-parameter search estimator.
For instance, we can use a F-test to retrieve the two best features for a dataset as follows:
>>> from sklearn.datasets import load_iris
>>> from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest
>>> from sklearn.feature_selection import f_classif
>>> X, y = load_iris(return_X_y=True)
>>> X.shape
(150, 4)
>>> X_new = SelectKBest(f_classif, k=2).fit_transform(X, y)
>>> X_new.shape
(150, 2)
These objects take as input a scoring function that returns univariate scores
and p-values (or only scores for SelectKBest
and
SelectPercentile
):
For regression:
r_regression
,f_regression
,mutual_info_regression
For classification:
chi2
,f_classif
,mutual_info_classif
The methods based on F-test estimate the degree of linear dependency between two random variables. On the other hand, mutual information methods can capture any kind of statistical dependency, but being nonparametric, they require more samples for accurate estimation. Note that the \(\chi^2\)-test should only be applied to non-negative features, such as frequencies.
Warning
Beware not to use a regression scoring function with a classification problem, you will get useless results.
Note
The SelectPercentile
and SelectKBest
support unsupervised
feature selection as well. One needs to provide a score_func
where y=None
.
The score_func
should use internally X
to compute the scores.
Examples
1.13.3. Recursive feature elimination#
Given an external estimator that assigns weights to features (e.g., the
coefficients of a linear model), the goal of recursive feature elimination (RFE
)
is to select features by recursively considering smaller and smaller sets of
features. First, the estimator is trained on the initial set of features and
the importance of each feature is obtained either through any specific attribute
(such as coef_
, feature_importances_
) or callable. Then, the least important
features are pruned from current set of features. That procedure is recursively
repeated on the pruned set until the desired number of features to select is
eventually reached.
RFECV
performs RFE in a cross-validation loop to find the optimal
number of features. In more details, the number of features selected is tuned
automatically by fitting an RFE
selector on the different
cross-validation splits (provided by the cv
parameter). The performance
of the RFE
selector are evaluated using scorer
for different number
of selected features and aggregated together. Finally, the scores are averaged
across folds and the number of features selected is set to the number of
features that maximize the cross-validation score.
Examples
Recursive feature elimination: A recursive feature elimination example showing the relevance of pixels in a digit classification task.
Recursive feature elimination with cross-validation: A recursive feature elimination example with automatic tuning of the number of features selected with cross-validation.
1.13.4. Feature selection using SelectFromModel#
SelectFromModel
is a meta-transformer that can be used alongside any
estimator that assigns importance to each feature through a specific attribute (such as
coef_
, feature_importances_
) or via an importance_getter
callable after fitting.
The features are considered unimportant and removed if the corresponding
importance of the feature values are below the provided
threshold
parameter. Apart from specifying the threshold numerically,
there are built-in heuristics for finding a threshold using a string argument.
Available heuristics are “mean”, “median” and float multiples of these like
“0.1*mean”. In combination with the threshold
criteria, one can use the
max_features
parameter to set a limit on the number of features to select.
For examples on how it is to be used refer to the sections below.
Examples
1.13.4.1. L1-based feature selection#
Linear models penalized with the L1 norm have
sparse solutions: many of their estimated coefficients are zero. When the goal
is to reduce the dimensionality of the data to use with another classifier,
they can be used along with SelectFromModel
to select the non-zero coefficients. In particular, sparse estimators useful
for this purpose are the Lasso
for regression, and
of LogisticRegression
and LinearSVC
for classification:
>>> from sklearn.svm import LinearSVC
>>> from sklearn.datasets import load_iris
>>> from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectFromModel
>>> X, y = load_iris(return_X_y=True)
>>> X.shape
(150, 4)
>>> lsvc = LinearSVC(C=0.01, penalty="l1", dual=False).fit(X, y)
>>> model = SelectFromModel(lsvc, prefit=True)
>>> X_new = model.transform(X)
>>> X_new.shape
(150, 3)
With SVMs and logistic-regression, the parameter C controls the sparsity: the smaller C the fewer features selected. With Lasso, the higher the alpha parameter, the fewer features selected.
Examples
L1-recovery and compressive sensing#
For a good choice of alpha, the Lasso can fully recover the exact set of non-zero variables using only few observations, provided certain specific conditions are met. In particular, the number of samples should be “sufficiently large”, or L1 models will perform at random, where “sufficiently large” depends on the number of non-zero coefficients, the logarithm of the number of features, the amount of noise, the smallest absolute value of non-zero coefficients, and the structure of the design matrix X. In addition, the design matrix must display certain specific properties, such as not being too correlated. On the use of Lasso for sparse signal recovery, see this example on compressive sensing: Compressive sensing: tomography reconstruction with L1 prior (Lasso).
There is no general rule to select an alpha parameter for recovery of
non-zero coefficients. It can by set by cross-validation
(LassoCV
or
LassoLarsCV
), though this may lead to
under-penalized models: including a small number of non-relevant variables
is not detrimental to prediction score. BIC
(LassoLarsIC
) tends, on the opposite, to set
high values of alpha.
References
Richard G. Baraniuk “Compressive Sensing”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine [120] July 2007 http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/~aguiar/CS_notes.pdf
1.13.4.2. Tree-based feature selection#
Tree-based estimators (see the sklearn.tree
module and forest
of trees in the sklearn.ensemble
module) can be used to compute
impurity-based feature importances, which in turn can be used to discard irrelevant
features (when coupled with the SelectFromModel
meta-transformer):
>>> from sklearn.ensemble import ExtraTreesClassifier
>>> from sklearn.datasets import load_iris
>>> from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectFromModel
>>> X, y = load_iris(return_X_y=True)
>>> X.shape
(150, 4)
>>> clf = ExtraTreesClassifier(n_estimators=50)
>>> clf = clf.fit(X, y)
>>> clf.feature_importances_
array([ 0.04..., 0.05..., 0.4..., 0.4...])
>>> model = SelectFromModel(clf, prefit=True)
>>> X_new = model.transform(X)
>>> X_new.shape
(150, 2)
Examples
Feature importances with a forest of trees: example on synthetic data showing the recovery of the actually meaningful features.
Permutation Importance vs Random Forest Feature Importance (MDI): example discussing the caveats of using impurity-based feature importances as a proxy for feature relevance.
1.13.5. Sequential Feature Selection#
Sequential Feature Selection [sfs] (SFS) is available in the
SequentialFeatureSelector
transformer.
SFS can be either forward or backward:
Forward-SFS is a greedy procedure that iteratively finds the best new feature
to add to the set of selected features. Concretely, we initially start with
zero features and find the one feature that maximizes a cross-validated score
when an estimator is trained on this single feature. Once that first feature
is selected, we repeat the procedure by adding a new feature to the set of
selected features. The procedure stops when the desired number of selected
features is reached, as determined by the n_features_to_select
parameter.
Backward-SFS follows the same idea but works in the opposite direction:
instead of starting with no features and greedily adding features, we start
with all the features and greedily remove features from the set. The
direction
parameter controls whether forward or backward SFS is used.
Details on Sequential Feature Selection#
In general, forward and backward selection do not yield equivalent results. Also, one may be much faster than the other depending on the requested number of selected features: if we have 10 features and ask for 7 selected features, forward selection would need to perform 7 iterations while backward selection would only need to perform 3.
SFS differs from RFE
and
SelectFromModel
in that it does not
require the underlying model to expose a coef_
or feature_importances_
attribute. It may however be slower considering that more models need to be
evaluated, compared to the other approaches. For example in backward
selection, the iteration going from m
features to m - 1
features using k-fold
cross-validation requires fitting m * k
models, while
RFE
would require only a single fit, and
SelectFromModel
always just does a single
fit and requires no iterations.
References
Ferri et al, Comparative study of techniques for large-scale feature selection.
Examples
1.13.6. Feature selection as part of a pipeline#
Feature selection is usually used as a pre-processing step before doing
the actual learning. The recommended way to do this in scikit-learn is
to use a Pipeline
:
clf = Pipeline([
('feature_selection', SelectFromModel(LinearSVC(penalty="l1"))),
('classification', RandomForestClassifier())
])
clf.fit(X, y)
In this snippet we make use of a LinearSVC
coupled with SelectFromModel
to evaluate feature importances and select the most relevant features.
Then, a RandomForestClassifier
is trained on the
transformed output, i.e. using only relevant features. You can perform
similar operations with the other feature selection methods and also
classifiers that provide a way to evaluate feature importances of course.
See the Pipeline
examples for more details.