Compare the effect of different scalers on data with outliers

Feature 0 (median income in a block) and feature 5 (number of households) of the California housing dataset have very different scales and contain some very large outliers. These two characteristics lead to difficulties to visualize the data and, more importantly, they can degrade the predictive performance of many machine learning algorithms. Unscaled data can also slow down or even prevent the convergence of many gradient-based estimators.

Indeed many estimators are designed with the assumption that each feature takes values close to zero or more importantly that all features vary on comparable scales. In particular, metric-based and gradient-based estimators often assume approximately standardized data (centered features with unit variances). A notable exception are decision tree-based estimators that are robust to arbitrary scaling of the data.

This example uses different scalers, transformers, and normalizers to bring the data within a pre-defined range.

Scalers are linear (or more precisely affine) transformers and differ from each other in the way to estimate the parameters used to shift and scale each feature.

QuantileTransformer provides a non-linear transformation in which distances between marginal outliers and inliers are shrunk.

Unlike the previous transformations, normalization refers to a per sample transformation instead of a per feature transformation.

The following code is a bit verbose, feel free to jump directly to the analysis of the results.

# Author:  Raghav RV <>
#          Guillaume Lemaitre <>
#          Thomas Unterthiner
# License: BSD 3 clause

from __future__ import print_function

import numpy as np

import matplotlib as mpl
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from matplotlib import cm

from sklearn.preprocessing import MinMaxScaler
from sklearn.preprocessing import minmax_scale
from sklearn.preprocessing import MaxAbsScaler
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.preprocessing import RobustScaler
from sklearn.preprocessing import Normalizer
from import QuantileTransformer

from sklearn.datasets import fetch_california_housing


dataset = fetch_california_housing()
X_full, y_full =,

# Take only 2 features to make visualization easier
# Feature of 0 has a long tail distribution.
# Feature 5 has a few but very large outliers.

X = X_full[:, [0, 5]]

distributions = [
    ('Unscaled data', X),
    ('Data after standard scaling',
    ('Data after min-max scaling',
    ('Data after max-abs scaling',
    ('Data after robust scaling',
        RobustScaler(quantile_range=(25, 75)).fit_transform(X)),
    ('Data after quantile transformation (uniform pdf)',
    ('Data after quantile transformation (gaussian pdf)',
    ('Data after sample-wise L2 normalizing',

# scale the output between 0 and 1 for the colorbar
y = minmax_scale(y_full)

def create_axes(title, figsize=(16, 6)):
    fig = plt.figure(figsize=figsize)

    # define the axis for the first plot
    left, width = 0.1, 0.22
    bottom, height = 0.1, 0.7
    bottom_h = height + 0.15
    left_h = left + width + 0.02

    rect_scatter = [left, bottom, width, height]
    rect_histx = [left, bottom_h, width, 0.1]
    rect_histy = [left_h, bottom, 0.05, height]

    ax_scatter = plt.axes(rect_scatter)
    ax_histx = plt.axes(rect_histx)
    ax_histy = plt.axes(rect_histy)

    # define the axis for the zoomed-in plot
    left = width + left + 0.2
    left_h = left + width + 0.02

    rect_scatter = [left, bottom, width, height]
    rect_histx = [left, bottom_h, width, 0.1]
    rect_histy = [left_h, bottom, 0.05, height]

    ax_scatter_zoom = plt.axes(rect_scatter)
    ax_histx_zoom = plt.axes(rect_histx)
    ax_histy_zoom = plt.axes(rect_histy)

    # define the axis for the colorbar
    left, width = width + left + 0.13, 0.01

    rect_colorbar = [left, bottom, width, height]
    ax_colorbar = plt.axes(rect_colorbar)

    return ((ax_scatter, ax_histy, ax_histx),
            (ax_scatter_zoom, ax_histy_zoom, ax_histx_zoom),

def plot_distribution(axes, X, y, hist_nbins=50, title="",
                      x0_label="", x1_label=""):
    ax, hist_X1, hist_X0 = axes


    # The scatter plot
    colors = cm.plasma_r(y)
    ax.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], alpha=0.5, marker='o', s=5, lw=0, c=colors)

    # Removing the top and the right spine for aesthetics
    # make nice axis layout
    ax.spines['left'].set_position(('outward', 10))
    ax.spines['bottom'].set_position(('outward', 10))

    # Histogram for axis X1 (feature 5)
    hist_X1.hist(X[:, 1], bins=hist_nbins, orientation='horizontal',
                 color='grey', ec='grey')

    # Histogram for axis X0 (feature 0)
    hist_X0.hist(X[:, 0], bins=hist_nbins, orientation='vertical',
                 color='grey', ec='grey')

Two plots will be shown for each scaler/normalizer/transformer. The left figure will show a scatter plot of the full data set while the right figure will exclude the extreme values considering only 99 % of the data set, excluding marginal outliers. In addition, the marginal distributions for each feature will be shown on the side of the scatter plot.

def make_plot(item_idx):
    title, X = distributions[item_idx]
    ax_zoom_out, ax_zoom_in, ax_colorbar = create_axes(title)
    axarr = (ax_zoom_out, ax_zoom_in)
    plot_distribution(axarr[0], X, y, hist_nbins=200,
                      x0_label="Median Income",
                      x1_label="Number of households",
                      title="Full data")

    # zoom-in
    zoom_in_percentile_range = (0, 99)
    cutoffs_X0 = np.percentile(X[:, 0], zoom_in_percentile_range)
    cutoffs_X1 = np.percentile(X[:, 1], zoom_in_percentile_range)

    non_outliers_mask = (
        np.all(X > [cutoffs_X0[0], cutoffs_X1[0]], axis=1) &
        np.all(X < [cutoffs_X0[1], cutoffs_X1[1]], axis=1))
    plot_distribution(axarr[1], X[non_outliers_mask], y[non_outliers_mask],
                      x0_label="Median Income",
                      x1_label="Number of households",

    norm = mpl.colors.Normalize(y_full.min(), y_full.max())
    mpl.colorbar.ColorbarBase(ax_colorbar, cmap=cm.plasma_r,
                              norm=norm, orientation='vertical',
                              label='Color mapping for values of y')

Original data

Each transformation is plotted showing two transformed features, with the left plot showing the entire dataset, and the right zoomed-in to show the dataset without the marginal outliers. A large majority of the samples are compacted to a specific range, [0, 10] for the median income and [0, 6] for the number of households. Note that there are some marginal outliers (some blocks have more than 1200 households). Therefore, a specific pre-processing can be very beneficial depending of the application. In the following, we present some insights and behaviors of those pre-processing methods in the presence of marginal outliers.



StandardScaler removes the mean and scales the data to unit variance. However, the outliers have an influence when computing the empirical mean and standard deviation which shrink the range of the feature values as shown in the left figure below. Note in particular that because the outliers on each feature have different magnitudes, the spread of the transformed data on each feature is very different: most of the data lie in the [-2, 4] range for the transformed median income feature while the same data is squeezed in the smaller [-0.2, 0.2] range for the transformed number of households.

StandardScaler therefore cannot guarantee balanced feature scales in the presence of outliers.



MinMaxScaler rescales the data set such that all feature values are in the range [0, 1] as shown in the right panel below. However, this scaling compress all inliers in the narrow range [0, 0.005] for the transformed number of households.

As StandardScaler, MinMaxScaler is very sensitive to the presence of outliers.



MaxAbsScaler differs from the previous scaler such that the absolute values are mapped in the range [0, 1]. On positive only data, this scaler behaves similarly to MinMaxScaler and therefore also suffers from the presence of large outliers.



Unlike the previous scalers, the centering and scaling statistics of this scaler are based on percentiles and are therefore not influenced by a few number of very large marginal outliers. Consequently, the resulting range of the transformed feature values is larger than for the previous scalers and, more importantly, are approximately similar: for both features most of the transformed values lie in a [-2, 3] range as seen in the zoomed-in figure. Note that the outliers themselves are still present in the transformed data. If a separate outlier clipping is desirable, a non-linear transformation is required (see below).


QuantileTransformer (uniform output)

QuantileTransformer applies a non-linear transformation such that the probability density function of each feature will be mapped to a uniform distribution. In this case, all the data will be mapped in the range [0, 1], even the outliers which cannot be distinguished anymore from the inliers.

As RobustScaler, QuantileTransformer is robust to outliers in the sense that adding or removing outliers in the training set will yield approximately the same transformation on held out data. But contrary to RobustScaler, QuantileTransformer will also automatically collapse any outlier by setting them to the a priori defined range boundaries (0 and 1).


QuantileTransformer (Gaussian output)

QuantileTransformer has an additional output_distribution parameter allowing to match a Gaussian distribution instead of a uniform distribution. Note that this non-parametetric transformer introduces saturation artifacts for extreme values.



The Normalizer rescales the vector for each sample to have unit norm, independently of the distribution of the samples. It can be seen on both figures below where all samples are mapped onto the unit circle. In our example the two selected features have only positive values; therefore the transformed data only lie in the positive quadrant. This would not be the case if some original features had a mix of positive and negative values.


Total running time of the script: ( 0 minutes 11.864 seconds)

Generated by Sphinx-Gallery