.. DO NOT EDIT. .. THIS FILE WAS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED BY SPHINX-GALLERY. .. TO MAKE CHANGES, EDIT THE SOURCE PYTHON FILE: .. "auto_examples/inspection/plot_partial_dependence.py" .. LINE NUMBERS ARE GIVEN BELOW. .. only:: html .. note:: :class: sphx-glr-download-link-note :ref:`Go to the end ` to download the full example code. or to run this example in your browser via JupyterLite or Binder .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-example-title .. _sphx_glr_auto_examples_inspection_plot_partial_dependence.py: =============================================================== Partial Dependence and Individual Conditional Expectation Plots =============================================================== Partial dependence plots show the dependence between the target function [2]_ and a set of features of interest, marginalizing over the values of all other features (the complement features). Due to the limits of human perception, the size of the set of features of interest must be small (usually, one or two) thus they are usually chosen among the most important features. Similarly, an individual conditional expectation (ICE) plot [3]_ shows the dependence between the target function and a feature of interest. However, unlike partial dependence plots, which show the average effect of the features of interest, ICE plots visualize the dependence of the prediction on a feature for each :term:`sample` separately, with one line per sample. Only one feature of interest is supported for ICE plots. This example shows how to obtain partial dependence and ICE plots from a :class:`~sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor` and a :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor` trained on the bike sharing dataset. The example is inspired by [1]_. .. [1] `Molnar, Christoph. "Interpretable machine learning. A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable", 2019. `_ .. [2] For classification you can think of it as the regression score before the link function. .. [3] :arxiv:`Goldstein, A., Kapelner, A., Bleich, J., and Pitkin, E. (2015). "Peeking Inside the Black Box: Visualizing Statistical Learning With Plots of Individual Conditional Expectation". Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 24(1): 44-65 <1309.6392>` .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 36-40 .. code-block:: Python # Authors: The scikit-learn developers # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 41-46 Bike sharing dataset preprocessing ---------------------------------- We will use the bike sharing dataset. The goal is to predict the number of bike rentals using weather and season data as well as the datetime information. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 46-56 .. code-block:: Python from sklearn.datasets import fetch_openml bikes = fetch_openml("Bike_Sharing_Demand", version=2, as_frame=True) # Make an explicit copy to avoid "SettingWithCopyWarning" from pandas X, y = bikes.data.copy(), bikes.target # We use only a subset of the data to speed up the example. X = X.iloc[::5, :] y = y[::5] .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 57-59 The feature `"weather"` has a particularity: the category `"heavy_rain"` is a rare category. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 59-61 .. code-block:: Python X["weather"].value_counts() .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none weather clear 2284 misty 904 rain 287 heavy_rain 1 Name: count, dtype: int64 .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 62-63 Because of this rare category, we collapse it into `"rain"`. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 63-70 .. code-block:: Python X["weather"] = ( X["weather"] .astype(object) .replace(to_replace="heavy_rain", value="rain") .astype("category") ) .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 71-72 We now have a closer look at the `"year"` feature: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 72-74 .. code-block:: Python X["year"].value_counts() .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none year 1 1747 0 1729 Name: count, dtype: int64 .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 75-77 We see that we have data from two years. We use the first year to train the model and the second year to test the model. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 77-82 .. code-block:: Python mask_training = X["year"] == 0.0 X = X.drop(columns=["year"]) X_train, y_train = X[mask_training], y[mask_training] X_test, y_test = X[~mask_training], y[~mask_training] .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 83-85 We can check the dataset information to see that we have heterogeneous data types. We have to preprocess the different columns accordingly. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 85-87 .. code-block:: Python X_train.info() .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Index: 1729 entries, 0 to 8640 Data columns (total 11 columns): # Column Non-Null Count Dtype --- ------ -------------- ----- 0 season 1729 non-null category 1 month 1729 non-null int64 2 hour 1729 non-null int64 3 holiday 1729 non-null category 4 weekday 1729 non-null int64 5 workingday 1729 non-null category 6 weather 1729 non-null category 7 temp 1729 non-null float64 8 feel_temp 1729 non-null float64 9 humidity 1729 non-null float64 10 windspeed 1729 non-null float64 dtypes: category(4), float64(4), int64(3) memory usage: 115.4 KB .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 88-94 From the previous information, we will consider the `category` columns as nominal categorical features. In addition, we will consider the date and time information as categorical features as well. We manually define the columns containing numerical and categorical features. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 94-102 .. code-block:: Python numerical_features = [ "temp", "feel_temp", "humidity", "windspeed", ] categorical_features = X_train.columns.drop(numerical_features) .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 103-110 Before we go into the details regarding the preprocessing of the different machine learning pipelines, we will try to get some additional intuition regarding the dataset that will be helpful to understand the model's statistical performance and results of the partial dependence analysis. We plot the average number of bike rentals by grouping the data by season and by year. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 110-145 .. code-block:: Python from itertools import product import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import numpy as np days = ("Sun", "Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat") hours = tuple(range(24)) xticklabels = [f"{day}\n{hour}:00" for day, hour in product(days, hours)] xtick_start, xtick_period = 6, 12 fig, axs = plt.subplots(nrows=2, figsize=(8, 6), sharey=True, sharex=True) average_bike_rentals = bikes.frame.groupby( ["year", "season", "weekday", "hour"], observed=True ).mean(numeric_only=True)["count"] for ax, (idx, df) in zip(axs, average_bike_rentals.groupby("year")): df.groupby("season", observed=True).plot(ax=ax, legend=True) # decorate the plot ax.set_xticks( np.linspace( start=xtick_start, stop=len(xticklabels), num=len(xticklabels) // xtick_period, ) ) ax.set_xticklabels(xticklabels[xtick_start::xtick_period]) ax.set_xlabel("") ax.set_ylabel("Average number of bike rentals") ax.set_title( f"Bike rental for {'2010 (train set)' if idx == 0.0 else '2011 (test set)'}" ) ax.set_ylim(0, 1_000) ax.set_xlim(0, len(xticklabels)) ax.legend(loc=2) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_001.png :alt: Bike rental for 2010 (train set), Bike rental for 2011 (test set) :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_001.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 146-168 The first striking difference between the train and test set is that the number of bike rentals is higher in the test set. For this reason, it will not be surprising to get a machine learning model that underestimates the number of bike rentals. We also observe that the number of bike rentals is lower during the spring season. In addition, we see that during working days, there is a specific pattern around 6-7 am and 5-6 pm with some peaks of bike rentals. We can keep in mind these different insights and use them to understand the partial dependence plot. Preprocessor for machine-learning models ---------------------------------------- Since we later use two different models, a :class:`~sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor` and a :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor`, we create two different preprocessors, specific for each model. Preprocessor for the neural network model ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We will use a :class:`~sklearn.preprocessing.QuantileTransformer` to scale the numerical features and encode the categorical features with a :class:`~sklearn.preprocessing.OneHotEncoder`. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 168-179 .. code-block:: Python from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer from sklearn.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder, QuantileTransformer mlp_preprocessor = ColumnTransformer( transformers=[ ("num", QuantileTransformer(n_quantiles=100), numerical_features), ("cat", OneHotEncoder(handle_unknown="ignore"), categorical_features), ] ) mlp_preprocessor .. raw:: html 
ColumnTransformer(transformers=[('num', QuantileTransformer(n_quantiles=100),
                                     ['temp', 'feel_temp', 'humidity',
                                      'windspeed']),
                                    ('cat', OneHotEncoder(handle_unknown='ignore'),
                                     Index(['season', 'month', 'hour', 'holiday', 'weekday', 'workingday',
           'weather'],
          dtype='object'))])
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.


.. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 180-186 Preprocessor for the gradient boosting model ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For the gradient boosting model, we leave the numerical features as-is and only encode the categorical features using a :class:`~sklearn.preprocessing.OrdinalEncoder`. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 186-198 .. code-block:: Python from sklearn.preprocessing import OrdinalEncoder hgbdt_preprocessor = ColumnTransformer( transformers=[ ("cat", OrdinalEncoder(), categorical_features), ("num", "passthrough", numerical_features), ], sparse_threshold=1, verbose_feature_names_out=False, ).set_output(transform="pandas") hgbdt_preprocessor .. raw:: html 
ColumnTransformer(sparse_threshold=1,
                      transformers=[('cat', OrdinalEncoder(),
                                     Index(['season', 'month', 'hour', 'holiday', 'weekday', 'workingday',
           'weather'],
          dtype='object')),
                                    ('num', 'passthrough',
                                     ['temp', 'feel_temp', 'humidity',
                                      'windspeed'])],
                      verbose_feature_names_out=False)
In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.


.. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 199-213 1-way partial dependence with different models ---------------------------------------------- In this section, we will compute 1-way partial dependence with two different machine-learning models: (i) a multi-layer perceptron and (ii) a gradient-boosting model. With these two models, we illustrate how to compute and interpret both partial dependence plot (PDP) for both numerical and categorical features and individual conditional expectation (ICE). Multi-layer perceptron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Let's fit a :class:`~sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor` and compute single-variable partial dependence plots. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 213-233 .. code-block:: Python from time import time from sklearn.neural_network import MLPRegressor from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline print("Training MLPRegressor...") tic = time() mlp_model = make_pipeline( mlp_preprocessor, MLPRegressor( hidden_layer_sizes=(30, 15), learning_rate_init=0.01, early_stopping=True, random_state=0, ), ) mlp_model.fit(X_train, y_train) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") print(f"Test R2 score: {mlp_model.score(X_test, y_test):.2f}") .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Training MLPRegressor... done in 0.605s Test R2 score: 0.61 .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 234-253 We configured a pipeline using the preprocessor that we created specifically for the neural network and tuned the neural network size and learning rate to get a reasonable compromise between training time and predictive performance on a test set. Importantly, this tabular dataset has very different dynamic ranges for its features. Neural networks tend to be very sensitive to features with varying scales and forgetting to preprocess the numeric feature would lead to a very poor model. It would be possible to get even higher predictive performance with a larger neural network but the training would also be significantly more expensive. Note that it is important to check that the model is accurate enough on a test set before plotting the partial dependence since there would be little use in explaining the impact of a given feature on the prediction function of a model with poor predictive performance. In this regard, our MLP model works reasonably well. We will plot the averaged partial dependence. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 253-291 .. code-block:: Python import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from sklearn.inspection import PartialDependenceDisplay common_params = { "subsample": 50, "n_jobs": 2, "grid_resolution": 20, "random_state": 0, } print("Computing partial dependence plots...") features_info = { # features of interest "features": ["temp", "humidity", "windspeed", "season", "weather", "hour"], # type of partial dependence plot "kind": "average", # information regarding categorical features "categorical_features": categorical_features, } tic = time() _, ax = plt.subplots(ncols=3, nrows=2, figsize=(9, 8), constrained_layout=True) display = PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator( mlp_model, X_train, **features_info, ax=ax, **common_params, ) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") _ = display.figure_.suptitle( ( "Partial dependence of the number of bike rentals\n" "for the bike rental dataset with an MLPRegressor" ), fontsize=16, ) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_002.png :alt: Partial dependence of the number of bike rentals for the bike rental dataset with an MLPRegressor :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_002.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Computing partial dependence plots... done in 0.603s .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 292-298 Gradient boosting ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Let's now fit a :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor` and compute the partial dependence on the same features. We also use the specific preprocessor we created for this model. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 298-314 .. code-block:: Python from sklearn.ensemble import HistGradientBoostingRegressor print("Training HistGradientBoostingRegressor...") tic = time() hgbdt_model = make_pipeline( hgbdt_preprocessor, HistGradientBoostingRegressor( categorical_features=categorical_features, random_state=0, max_iter=50, ), ) hgbdt_model.fit(X_train, y_train) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") print(f"Test R2 score: {hgbdt_model.score(X_test, y_test):.2f}") .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Training HistGradientBoostingRegressor... done in 0.109s Test R2 score: 0.62 .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 315-326 Here, we used the default hyperparameters for the gradient boosting model without any preprocessing as tree-based models are naturally robust to monotonic transformations of numerical features. Note that on this tabular dataset, Gradient Boosting Machines are both significantly faster to train and more accurate than neural networks. It is also significantly cheaper to tune their hyperparameters (the defaults tend to work well while this is not often the case for neural networks). We will plot the partial dependence for some of the numerical and categorical features. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 326-345 .. code-block:: Python print("Computing partial dependence plots...") tic = time() _, ax = plt.subplots(ncols=3, nrows=2, figsize=(9, 8), constrained_layout=True) display = PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator( hgbdt_model, X_train, **features_info, ax=ax, **common_params, ) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") _ = display.figure_.suptitle( ( "Partial dependence of the number of bike rentals\n" "for the bike rental dataset with a gradient boosting" ), fontsize=16, ) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_003.png :alt: Partial dependence of the number of bike rentals for the bike rental dataset with a gradient boosting :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_003.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Computing partial dependence plots... done in 1.138s .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 346-375 Analysis of the plots ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We will first look at the PDPs for the numerical features. For both models, the general trend of the PDP of the temperature is that the number of bike rentals is increasing with temperature. We can make a similar analysis but with the opposite trend for the humidity features. The number of bike rentals is decreasing when the humidity increases. Finally, we see the same trend for the wind speed feature. The number of bike rentals is decreasing when the wind speed is increasing for both models. We also observe that :class:`~sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor` has much smoother predictions than :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor`. Now, we will look at the partial dependence plots for the categorical features. We observe that the spring season is the lowest bar for the season feature. With the weather feature, the rain category is the lowest bar. Regarding the hour feature, we see two peaks around the 7 am and 6 pm. These findings are in line with the the observations we made earlier on the dataset. However, it is worth noting that we are creating potential meaningless synthetic samples if features are correlated. ICE vs. PDP ~~~~~~~~~~~ PDP is an average of the marginal effects of the features. We are averaging the response of all samples of the provided set. Thus, some effects could be hidden. In this regard, it is possible to plot each individual response. This representation is called the Individual Effect Plot (ICE). In the plot below, we plot 50 randomly selected ICEs for the temperature and humidity features. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 375-395 .. code-block:: Python print("Computing partial dependence plots and individual conditional expectation...") tic = time() _, ax = plt.subplots(ncols=2, figsize=(6, 4), sharey=True, constrained_layout=True) features_info = { "features": ["temp", "humidity"], "kind": "both", "centered": True, } display = PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator( hgbdt_model, X_train, **features_info, ax=ax, **common_params, ) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") _ = display.figure_.suptitle("ICE and PDP representations", fontsize=16) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_004.png :alt: ICE and PDP representations :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_004.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Computing partial dependence plots and individual conditional expectation... done in 0.505s .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 396-406 We see that the ICE for the temperature feature gives us some additional information: Some of the ICE lines are flat while some others show a decrease of the dependence for temperature above 35 degrees Celsius. We observe a similar pattern for the humidity feature: some of the ICEs lines show a sharp decrease when the humidity is above 80%. Not all ICE lines are parallel, this indicates that the model finds interactions between features. We can repeat the experiment by constraining the gradient boosting model to not use any interactions between features using the parameter `interaction_cst`: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 406-416 .. code-block:: Python from sklearn.base import clone interaction_cst = [[i] for i in range(X_train.shape[1])] hgbdt_model_without_interactions = ( clone(hgbdt_model) .set_params(histgradientboostingregressor__interaction_cst=interaction_cst) .fit(X_train, y_train) ) print(f"Test R2 score: {hgbdt_model_without_interactions.score(X_test, y_test):.2f}") .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Test R2 score: 0.38 .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 417-429 .. code-block:: Python _, ax = plt.subplots(ncols=2, figsize=(6, 4), sharey=True, constrained_layout=True) features_info["centered"] = False display = PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator( hgbdt_model_without_interactions, X_train, **features_info, ax=ax, **common_params, ) _ = display.figure_.suptitle("ICE and PDP representations", fontsize=16) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_005.png :alt: ICE and PDP representations :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_005.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 430-438 2D interaction plots -------------------- PDPs with two features of interest enable us to visualize interactions among them. However, ICEs cannot be plotted in an easy manner and thus interpreted. We will show the representation of available in :meth:`~sklearn.inspection.PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator` that is a 2D heatmap. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 438-457 .. code-block:: Python print("Computing partial dependence plots...") features_info = { "features": ["temp", "humidity", ("temp", "humidity")], "kind": "average", } _, ax = plt.subplots(ncols=3, figsize=(10, 4), constrained_layout=True) tic = time() display = PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator( hgbdt_model, X_train, **features_info, ax=ax, **common_params, ) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") _ = display.figure_.suptitle( "1-way vs 2-way of numerical PDP using gradient boosting", fontsize=16 ) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_006.png :alt: 1-way vs 2-way of numerical PDP using gradient boosting :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_006.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Computing partial dependence plots... done in 6.951s .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 458-474 The two-way partial dependence plot shows the dependence of the number of bike rentals on joint values of temperature and humidity. We clearly see an interaction between the two features. For a temperature higher than 20 degrees Celsius, the humidity has a impact on the number of bike rentals that seems independent on the temperature. On the other hand, for temperatures lower than 20 degrees Celsius, both the temperature and humidity continuously impact the number of bike rentals. Furthermore, the slope of the of the impact ridge of the 20 degrees Celsius threshold is very dependent on the humidity level: the ridge is steep under dry conditions but much smoother under wetter conditions above 70% of humidity. We now contrast those results with the same plots computed for the model constrained to learn a prediction function that does not depend on such non-linear feature interactions. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 474-493 .. code-block:: Python print("Computing partial dependence plots...") features_info = { "features": ["temp", "humidity", ("temp", "humidity")], "kind": "average", } _, ax = plt.subplots(ncols=3, figsize=(10, 4), constrained_layout=True) tic = time() display = PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator( hgbdt_model_without_interactions, X_train, **features_info, ax=ax, **common_params, ) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") _ = display.figure_.suptitle( "1-way vs 2-way of numerical PDP using gradient boosting", fontsize=16 ) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_007.png :alt: 1-way vs 2-way of numerical PDP using gradient boosting :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_007.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Computing partial dependence plots... done in 6.310s .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 494-515 The 1D partial dependence plots for the model constrained to not model feature interactions show local spikes for each features individually, in particular for for the "humidity" feature. Those spikes might be reflecting a degraded behavior of the model that attempts to somehow compensate for the forbidden interactions by overfitting particular training points. Note that the predictive performance of this model as measured on the test set is significantly worse than that of the original, unconstrained model. Also note that the number of local spikes visible on those plots is depends on the grid resolution parameter of the PD plot itself. Those local spikes result in a noisily gridded 2D PD plot. It is quite challenging to tell whether or not there are no interaction between those features because of the high frequency oscillations in the humidity feature. However it can clearly be seen that the simple interaction effect observed when the temperature crosses the 20 degrees boundary is no longer visible for this model. The partial dependence between categorical features will provide a discrete representation that can be shown as a heatmap. For instance the interaction between the season, the weather, and the target would be as follow: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 515-536 .. code-block:: Python print("Computing partial dependence plots...") features_info = { "features": ["season", "weather", ("season", "weather")], "kind": "average", "categorical_features": categorical_features, } _, ax = plt.subplots(ncols=3, figsize=(14, 6), constrained_layout=True) tic = time() display = PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator( hgbdt_model, X_train, **features_info, ax=ax, **common_params, ) print(f"done in {time() - tic:.3f}s") _ = display.figure_.suptitle( "1-way vs 2-way PDP of categorical features using gradient boosting", fontsize=16 ) .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_008.png :alt: 1-way vs 2-way PDP of categorical features using gradient boosting :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_008.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out .. code-block:: none Computing partial dependence plots... done in 0.546s .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 537-543 3D representation ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Let's make the same partial dependence plot for the 2 features interaction, this time in 3 dimensions. unused but required import for doing 3d projections with matplotlib < 3.2 .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 543-572 .. code-block:: Python import mpl_toolkits.mplot3d # noqa: F401 import numpy as np from sklearn.inspection import partial_dependence fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5.5, 5)) features = ("temp", "humidity") pdp = partial_dependence( hgbdt_model, X_train, features=features, kind="average", grid_resolution=10 ) XX, YY = np.meshgrid(pdp["grid_values"][0], pdp["grid_values"][1]) Z = pdp.average[0].T ax = fig.add_subplot(projection="3d") fig.add_axes(ax) surf = ax.plot_surface(XX, YY, Z, rstride=1, cstride=1, cmap=plt.cm.BuPu, edgecolor="k") ax.set_xlabel(features[0]) ax.set_ylabel(features[1]) fig.suptitle( "PD of number of bike rentals on\nthe temperature and humidity GBDT model", fontsize=16, ) # pretty init view ax.view_init(elev=22, azim=122) clb = plt.colorbar(surf, pad=0.08, shrink=0.6, aspect=10) clb.ax.set_title("Partial\ndependence") plt.show() .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_009.png :alt: PD of number of bike rentals on the temperature and humidity GBDT model, Partial dependence :srcset: /auto_examples/inspection/images/sphx_glr_plot_partial_dependence_009.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing **Total running time of the script:** (0 minutes 21.266 seconds) .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_inspection_plot_partial_dependence.py: .. only:: html .. container:: sphx-glr-footer sphx-glr-footer-example .. container:: binder-badge .. image:: images/binder_badge_logo.svg :target: https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/1.6.X?urlpath=lab/tree/notebooks/auto_examples/inspection/plot_partial_dependence.ipynb :alt: Launch binder :width: 150 px .. container:: lite-badge .. image:: images/jupyterlite_badge_logo.svg :target: ../../lite/lab/index.html?path=auto_examples/inspection/plot_partial_dependence.ipynb :alt: Launch JupyterLite :width: 150 px .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-jupyter :download:`Download Jupyter notebook: plot_partial_dependence.ipynb ` .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-python :download:`Download Python source code: plot_partial_dependence.py ` .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-zip :download:`Download zipped: plot_partial_dependence.zip ` .. include:: plot_partial_dependence.recommendations .. only:: html .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-signature `Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery `_