.. DO NOT EDIT. .. THIS FILE WAS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED BY SPHINX-GALLERY. .. TO MAKE CHANGES, EDIT THE SOURCE PYTHON FILE: .. "auto_examples/decomposition/plot_ica_vs_pca.py" .. LINE NUMBERS ARE GIVEN BELOW. .. only:: html .. note:: :class: sphx-glr-download-link-note :ref:`Go to the end ` to download the full example code. or to run this example in your browser via JupyterLite or Binder .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-example-title .. _sphx_glr_auto_examples_decomposition_plot_ica_vs_pca.py: ========================== FastICA on 2D point clouds ========================== This example illustrates visually in the feature space a comparison by results using two different component analysis techniques. :ref:`ICA` vs :ref:`PCA`. Representing ICA in the feature space gives the view of 'geometric ICA': ICA is an algorithm that finds directions in the feature space corresponding to projections with high non-Gaussianity. These directions need not be orthogonal in the original feature space, but they are orthogonal in the whitened feature space, in which all directions correspond to the same variance. PCA, on the other hand, finds orthogonal directions in the raw feature space that correspond to directions accounting for maximum variance. Here we simulate independent sources using a highly non-Gaussian process, 2 student T with a low number of degrees of freedom (top left figure). We mix them to create observations (top right figure). In this raw observation space, directions identified by PCA are represented by orange vectors. We represent the signal in the PCA space, after whitening by the variance corresponding to the PCA vectors (lower left). Running ICA corresponds to finding a rotation in this space to identify the directions of largest non-Gaussianity (lower right). .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 31-35 .. code-block:: Python # Authors: The scikit-learn developers # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 36-38 Generate sample data -------------------- .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 38-58 .. code-block:: Python import numpy as np from sklearn.decomposition import PCA, FastICA rng = np.random.RandomState(42) S = rng.standard_t(1.5, size=(20000, 2)) S[:, 0] *= 2.0 # Mix data A = np.array([[1, 1], [0, 2]]) # Mixing matrix X = np.dot(S, A.T) # Generate observations pca = PCA() S_pca_ = pca.fit(X).transform(X) ica = FastICA(random_state=rng, whiten="arbitrary-variance") S_ica_ = ica.fit(X).transform(X) # Estimate the sources .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 59-61 Plot results ------------ .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 61-116 .. code-block:: Python import matplotlib.pyplot as plt def plot_samples(S, axis_list=None): plt.scatter( S[:, 0], S[:, 1], s=2, marker="o", zorder=10, color="steelblue", alpha=0.5 ) if axis_list is not None: for axis, color, label in axis_list: x_axis, y_axis = axis / axis.std() plt.quiver( (0, 0), (0, 0), x_axis, y_axis, zorder=11, width=0.01, scale=6, color=color, label=label, ) plt.hlines(0, -5, 5, color="black", linewidth=0.5) plt.vlines(0, -3, 3, color="black", linewidth=0.5) plt.xlim(-5, 5) plt.ylim(-3, 3) plt.gca().set_aspect("equal") plt.xlabel("x") plt.ylabel("y") plt.figure() plt.subplot(2, 2, 1) plot_samples(S / S.std()) plt.title("True Independent Sources") axis_list = [(pca.components_.T, "orange", "PCA"), (ica.mixing_, "red", "ICA")] plt.subplot(2, 2, 2) plot_samples(X / np.std(X), axis_list=axis_list) legend = plt.legend(loc="upper left") legend.set_zorder(100) plt.title("Observations") plt.subplot(2, 2, 3) plot_samples(S_pca_ / np.std(S_pca_)) plt.title("PCA recovered signals") plt.subplot(2, 2, 4) plot_samples(S_ica_ / np.std(S_ica_)) plt.title("ICA recovered signals") plt.subplots_adjust(0.09, 0.04, 0.94, 0.94, 0.26, 0.36) plt.tight_layout() plt.show() .. image-sg:: /auto_examples/decomposition/images/sphx_glr_plot_ica_vs_pca_001.png :alt: True Independent Sources, Observations, PCA recovered signals, ICA recovered signals :srcset: /auto_examples/decomposition/images/sphx_glr_plot_ica_vs_pca_001.png :class: sphx-glr-single-img .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing **Total running time of the script:** (0 minutes 0.376 seconds) .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_decomposition_plot_ica_vs_pca.py: .. only:: html .. container:: sphx-glr-footer sphx-glr-footer-example .. container:: binder-badge .. image:: images/binder_badge_logo.svg :target: https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/1.6.X?urlpath=lab/tree/notebooks/auto_examples/decomposition/plot_ica_vs_pca.ipynb :alt: Launch binder :width: 150 px .. container:: lite-badge .. image:: images/jupyterlite_badge_logo.svg :target: ../../lite/lab/index.html?path=auto_examples/decomposition/plot_ica_vs_pca.ipynb :alt: Launch JupyterLite :width: 150 px .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-jupyter :download:`Download Jupyter notebook: plot_ica_vs_pca.ipynb ` .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-python :download:`Download Python source code: plot_ica_vs_pca.py ` .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-zip :download:`Download zipped: plot_ica_vs_pca.zip ` .. include:: plot_ica_vs_pca.recommendations .. only:: html .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-signature `Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery `_