sklearn.mixture is a package which enables one to learn
Gaussian Mixture Models (diagonal, spherical, tied and full covariance
matrices supported), sample them, and estimate them from
data. Facilities to help determine the appropriate number of
components are also provided.
Two-component Gaussian mixture model:data points, and equi-probability
surfaces of the model.¶
A Gaussian mixture model is a probabilistic model that assumes all the
data points are generated from a mixture of a finite number of
Gaussian distributions with unknown parameters. One can think of
mixture models as generalizing k-means clustering to incorporate
information about the covariance structure of the data as well as the
centers of the latent Gaussians.
Scikit-learn implements different classes to estimate Gaussian
mixture models, that correspond to different estimation strategies,
detailed below.
The GaussianMixture object implements the
expectation-maximization (EM)
algorithm for fitting mixture-of-Gaussian models. It can also draw
confidence ellipsoids for multivariate models, and compute the
Bayesian Information Criterion to assess the number of clusters in the
data. A GaussianMixture.fit method is provided that learns a Gaussian
Mixture Model from train data. Given test data, it can assign to each
sample the Gaussian it mostly probably belong to using
the GaussianMixture.predict method.
The GaussianMixture comes with different options to constrain the
covariance of the difference classes estimated: spherical, diagonal, tied or
full covariance.
Examples:
See GMM covariances for an example of
using the Gaussian mixture as clustering on the iris dataset.
It is the fastest algorithm for learning mixture models
Agnostic
As this algorithm maximizes only the likelihood, it
will not bias the means towards zero, or bias the cluster sizes to
have specific structures that might or might not apply.
When one has insufficiently many points per
mixture, estimating the covariance matrices becomes difficult,
and the algorithm is known to diverge and find solutions with
infinite likelihood unless one regularizes the covariances artificially.
Number of components
This algorithm will always use all the
components it has access to, needing held-out data
or information theoretical criteria to decide how many components to use
in the absence of external cues.
2.1.1.2. Selecting the number of components in a classical Gaussian Mixture Model¶
The BIC criterion can be used to select the number of components in a Gaussian
Mixture in an efficient way. In theory, it recovers the true number of
components only in the asymptotic regime (i.e. if much data is available and
assuming that the data was actually generated i.i.d. from a mixture of Gaussian
distribution). Note that using a Variational Bayesian Gaussian mixture
avoids the specification of the number of components for a Gaussian mixture
model.
The main difficulty in learning Gaussian mixture models from unlabeled
data is that it is one usually doesn’t know which points came from
which latent component (if one has access to this information it gets
very easy to fit a separate Gaussian distribution to each set of
points). Expectation-maximization
is a well-founded statistical
algorithm to get around this problem by an iterative process. First
one assumes random components (randomly centered on data points,
learned from k-means, or even just normally distributed around the
origin) and computes for each point a probability of being generated by
each component of the model. Then, one tweaks the
parameters to maximize the likelihood of the data given those
assignments. Repeating this process is guaranteed to always converge
to a local optimum.
The BayesianGaussianMixture object implements a variant of the
Gaussian mixture model with variational inference algorithms. The API is
similar as the one defined by GaussianMixture.
Variational inference is an extension of expectation-maximization that
maximizes a lower bound on model evidence (including
priors) instead of data likelihood. The principle behind
variational methods is the same as expectation-maximization (that is
both are iterative algorithms that alternate between finding the
probabilities for each point to be generated by each mixture and
fitting the mixture to these assigned points), but variational
methods add regularization by integrating information from prior
distributions. This avoids the singularities often found in
expectation-maximization solutions but introduces some subtle biases
to the model. Inference is often notably slower, but not usually as
much so as to render usage unpractical.
Due to its Bayesian nature, the variational algorithm needs more hyper-
parameters than expectation-maximization, the most important of these being the
concentration parameter weight_concentration_prior. Specifying a low value
for the concentration prior will make the model put most of the weight on few
components set the remaining components weights very close to zero. High values
of the concentration prior will allow a larger number of components to be active
in the mixture.
The parameters implementation of the BayesianGaussianMixture class
proposes two types of prior for the weights distribution: a finite mixture model
with Dirichlet distribution and an infinite mixture model with the Dirichlet
Process. In practice Dirichlet Process inference algorithm is approximated and
uses a truncated distribution with a fixed maximum number of components (called
the Stick-breaking representation). The number of components actually used
almost always depends on the data.
The next figure compares the results obtained for the different type of the
weight concentration prior (parameter weight_concentration_prior_type)
for different values of weight_concentration_prior.
Here, we can see the value of the weight_concentration_prior parameter
has a strong impact on the effective number of active components obtained. We
can also notice that large values for the concentration weight prior lead to
more uniform weights when the type of prior is ‘dirichlet_distribution’ while
this is not necessarily the case for the ‘dirichlet_process’ type (used by
default).
The examples below compare Gaussian mixture models with a fixed number of
components, to the variational Gaussian mixture models with a Dirichlet process
prior. Here, a classical Gaussian mixture is fitted with 5 components on a
dataset composed of 2 clusters. We can see that the variational Gaussian mixture
with a Dirichlet process prior is able to limit itself to only 2 components
whereas the Gaussian mixture fits the data with a fixed number of components
that has to be set a priori by the user. In this case the user has selected
n_components=5 which does not match the true generative distribution of this
toy dataset. Note that with very little observations, the variational Gaussian
mixture models with a Dirichlet process prior can take a conservative stand, and
fit only one component.
On the following figure we are fitting a dataset not well-depicted by a
Gaussian mixture. Adjusting the weight_concentration_prior, parameter of the
BayesianGaussianMixture controls the number of components used to fit
this data. We also present on the last two plots a random sampling generated
from the two resulting mixtures.
when weight_concentration_prior is small enough and
n_components is larger than what is found necessary by the model, the
Variational Bayesian mixture model has a natural tendency to set some mixture
weights values close to zero. This makes it possible to let the model choose
a suitable number of effective components automatically. Only an upper bound
of this number needs to be provided. Note however that the “ideal” number of
active components is very application specific and is typically ill-defined
in a data exploration setting.
Less sensitivity to the number of parameters
unlike finite models, which will
almost always use all components as much as they can, and hence will produce
wildly different solutions for different numbers of components, the
variational inference with a Dirichlet process prior
(weight_concentration_prior_type='dirichlet_process') won’t change much
with changes to the parameters, leading to more stability and less tuning.
Regularization
due to the incorporation of prior information,
variational solutions have less pathological special cases than
expectation-maximization solutions.
the extra parametrization necessary for variational inference make
inference slower, although not by much.
Hyperparameters
this algorithm needs an extra hyperparameter
that might need experimental tuning via cross-validation.
Bias
there are many implicit biases in the inference algorithms (and also in
the Dirichlet process if used), and whenever there is a mismatch between
these biases and the data it might be possible to fit better models using a
finite mixture.
Here we describe variational inference algorithms on Dirichlet process
mixture. The Dirichlet process is a prior probability distribution on
clusterings with an infinite, unbounded, number of partitions.
Variational techniques let us incorporate this prior structure on
Gaussian mixture models at almost no penalty in inference time, comparing
with a finite Gaussian mixture model.
An important question is how can the Dirichlet process use an infinite,
unbounded number of clusters and still be consistent. While a full explanation
doesn’t fit this manual, one can think of its stick breaking process
analogy to help understanding it. The stick breaking process is a generative
story for the Dirichlet process. We start with a unit-length stick and in each
step we break off a portion of the remaining stick. Each time, we associate the
length of the piece of the stick to the proportion of points that falls into a
group of the mixture. At the end, to represent the infinite mixture, we
associate the last remaining piece of the stick to the proportion of points
that don’t fall into all the other groups. The length of each piece is a random
variable with probability proportional to the concentration parameter. Smaller
value of the concentration will divide the unit-length into larger pieces of
the stick (defining more concentrated distribution). Larger concentration
values will create smaller pieces of the stick (increasing the number of
components with non zero weights).
Variational inference techniques for the Dirichlet process still work
with a finite approximation to this infinite mixture model, but
instead of having to specify a priori how many components one wants to
use, one just specifies the concentration parameter and an upper bound
on the number of mixture components (this upper bound, assuming it is
higher than the “true” number of components, affects only algorithmic
complexity, not the actual number of components used).
