Effect of varying threshold for self-training

This example illustrates the effect of a varying threshold on self-training. The breast_cancer dataset is loaded, and labels are deleted such that only 50 out of 569 samples have labels. A SelfTrainingClassifier is fitted on this dataset, with varying thresholds.

The upper graph shows the amount of labeled samples that the classifier has available by the end of fit, and the accuracy of the classifier. The lower graph shows the last iteration in which a sample was labeled. All values are cross validated with 3 folds.

At low thresholds (in [0.4, 0.5]), the classifier learns from samples that were labeled with a low confidence. These low-confidence samples are likely have incorrect predicted labels, and as a result, fitting on these incorrect labels produces a poor accuracy. Note that the classifier labels almost all of the samples, and only takes one iteration.

For very high thresholds (in [0.9, 1)) we observe that the classifier does not augment its dataset (the amount of self-labeled samples is 0). As a result, the accuracy achieved with a threshold of 0.9999 is the same as a normal supervised classifier would achieve.

The optimal accuracy lies in between both of these extremes at a threshold of around 0.7.

# Authors: Oliver Rausch <rauscho@ethz.ch>
# License: BSD

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold
from sklearn.semi_supervised import SelfTrainingClassifier
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
from sklearn.utils import shuffle

n_splits = 3

X, y = datasets.load_breast_cancer(return_X_y=True)
X, y = shuffle(X, y, random_state=42)
y_true = y.copy()
y[50:] = -1
total_samples = y.shape[0]

base_classifier = SVC(probability=True, gamma=0.001, random_state=42)

x_values = np.arange(0.4, 1.05, 0.05)
x_values = np.append(x_values, 0.99999)
scores = np.empty((x_values.shape[0], n_splits))
amount_labeled = np.empty((x_values.shape[0], n_splits))
amount_iterations = np.empty((x_values.shape[0], n_splits))

for (i, threshold) in enumerate(x_values):
    self_training_clf = SelfTrainingClassifier(base_classifier, threshold=threshold)

    # We need manual cross validation so that we don't treat -1 as a separate
    # class when computing accuracy
    skfolds = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=n_splits)
    for fold, (train_index, test_index) in enumerate(skfolds.split(X, y)):
        X_train = X[train_index]
        y_train = y[train_index]
        X_test = X[test_index]
        y_test = y[test_index]
        y_test_true = y_true[test_index]

        self_training_clf.fit(X_train, y_train)

        # The amount of labeled samples that at the end of fitting
        amount_labeled[i, fold] = (
            total_samples
            - np.unique(self_training_clf.labeled_iter_, return_counts=True)[1][0]
        )
        # The last iteration the classifier labeled a sample in
        amount_iterations[i, fold] = np.max(self_training_clf.labeled_iter_)

        y_pred = self_training_clf.predict(X_test)
        scores[i, fold] = accuracy_score(y_test_true, y_pred)


ax1 = plt.subplot(211)
ax1.errorbar(
    x_values, scores.mean(axis=1), yerr=scores.std(axis=1), capsize=2, color="b"
)
ax1.set_ylabel("Accuracy", color="b")
ax1.tick_params("y", colors="b")

ax2 = ax1.twinx()
ax2.errorbar(
    x_values,
    amount_labeled.mean(axis=1),
    yerr=amount_labeled.std(axis=1),
    capsize=2,
    color="g",
)
ax2.set_ylim(bottom=0)
ax2.set_ylabel("Amount of labeled samples", color="g")
ax2.tick_params("y", colors="g")

ax3 = plt.subplot(212, sharex=ax1)
ax3.errorbar(
    x_values,
    amount_iterations.mean(axis=1),
    yerr=amount_iterations.std(axis=1),
    capsize=2,
    color="b",
)
ax3.set_ylim(bottom=0)
ax3.set_ylabel("Amount of iterations")
ax3.set_xlabel("Threshold")

plt.show()